QUOTE (knot28 @ November 14th 2009 7:08 PM)

Is the Cabela's tactical scope for $150 worth it for what I want to do or should I save my money for something else?
I'm currently working up loads to see which one shoots best for my gun, once I figure it out I'll stick with that one. I love shooting this gun with iron sights but want to use a gun rest and scope to see which loads group the best at 200yds, once figured the scope is coming off (unless I can ever afford a Trijicon).
Is this a decent enough scope to accomplish this or would I be better off taking my Bushnell Elite off of my .270? The Elite gives me excellent groups on the .270 (for me anynow, I'm not a comp shooter) but would love a tactical scope in this gun.
Has anybody had one of these, whats your opinion on this?
Can it be mounted on a Picatanny rail or is that another problem?
Thanks in advance for your help.
I, unfortunately, cannot speak to that specific scope. I can, however, give you my thoughts on the process of load development. The use of a scope on a rifle when working up a load that will be used for an iron sighted rifle is a plus. The elimination of the human variable is important if you are looking at repeatable results.
Using a scope, pedestal rests and sand bags is the best method for load development IMHO. There are days that none of us can hit our butt with irons on far targets but those days are a lot less frequent with a scope. I, personally, use a 20 power Leupold target scope on my rifles when I am working up accuracy loads. It's the theory of aim small, shoot small. I don't have an issue with it on most of the rifles I shoot. I don't run the 20X on my big magnums but on 308 and lower I am comfortable with it.
I will work up the load and then switch over to what ever scope/sight type I am going to use. I got so lazy I have two sets of rings on the 20 X. One is the Leupold style and the other is the Weaver type. That way I am not taking them on and off the scope and don't have any scratching issues that way.
Just my thoughts on the issue and what works for me.
, unfortunately, cannot speak to that specific scope. I can, however, give you my thoughts on the processof load development. The use of a scope on a rifle when working up a load that will be used for an iron sighted rifle is a plus. The eleimination of the human variable is important if you are looking at repeatable results.
Using
Greg