QUOTE (TomJefferson @ October 5th 2005 7:35 AM)

That's an easy one.
They kicked the rifle off with the model 180 which had a sub 2 MOA which sold like pancakes back in the early 80's as people traded in yes even their ARs for them. Then model 181 started out sub 2 MOA then they just let the tooling wear the hell out and have been riding the initial market perception now into the ground.
The early Minis were very much reminicent of their military predecessors in almost ever respect. The later ones, well it depends if you get a good one or not. MIL standards for quality were not a priority only sales. It became a mature product to be milked.
I have a number of Rugers and quite frankly have been very happy with them but I also have been around enough of them to know in some cases I was lucky. Like most companies profits drive the company and management shifts as well as strategic direction. MIL guns on the otherhand have to meet a standard and keep that standard.
If the Mini had made it into military production even overseas, we'd all be singing a different tune instead of "I got a good one!" :dry:
Tj
In 1985 The Bermuda Regiment replaced its British made L1A1 SLR's (7.62mm) with the wooded stocked
Mini-14 20GB (semi automatic only). The fact that it did not look too threatening, and the unit price bullpup stock with laser ruger mini 14 which swayed the purchasing body. The wooden stock was replaced with a choate black fibreglass stock complete with pistol grip, in 1993. This is the largest military group to use the Mini-14.
While not as accurate as most bolt action rifles, or the more expensive AR-15 design, it is more accurate than the AK-47 and SKS designs that it generally competes with in the civilian market. It is a very rugged and design which addresses some shortcomings in the M14 with the self cleaning gas system, which uses an approach more similar to the AK-47.
My next rifle will be a Mini-30.
This post has been edited by mnblaster: December 20th 2005 9:32 PM