|
I just picked up a Nikon 4-16 x 42 Monarch with the Nikoplex for my .204. It is one hell of a nice scope for the money. I think it is a lot better than my Leupolds and I got it for only $400.
After seeing this scope I think it is superior to my Leupold VX3 and want to take it off the 22-250 and put a Nikon on it identical to the 204 but was thinking about the Mildot. Any pros or cons of the mildot? I would love to go prairie dog hunting in the future and was curious if the mildot was good or bad for pdogs? Thought the mildot would be good for yardage compensations, but possibly bad if the dots covered long range targets too much? I prefer a thin crosshair for long range stuff, but the mildot looks pretty sweet. What do ya guys think?
Signature:
CRE10
"Don't be afraid to go after what you want to do, and what you want to be. But don't be afraid to be willing to pay the price." Lane Frost
"You mess with the bull, you get the horns."
in baseball, payback is usually a pitch. ... It's a dance between pitcher and hitter - and both understand the rules of engagement
You have undertaken to cheat me. I won't sue you, for the law is too slow. I'll ruin you. * Cornelius Vanderbilt
|