Those of you who've been here for awhile may remember
THIS thread. At that time, I purchased an additional, identical pistol and have used this second gun as my training and competition pistol. The only modification I made was to exchange the OEM plastic sights with Meprolight night sights.
The past year and a half has been a rough one in this gun's life. It was WELL used (abused) when I bought it, and I gave it no mercy in my treatment of it. It's been shot in every weather condition at matches and in training. It was given out to students to try a different caliber. "Poor" would be an accurate way to describe how I've treated this gun over the course of this test.
What I've done to simulate accelerated wear and mild abuse:
-Minimal cleaning and lubrication: I'd clean it monthly and never lubricate it between cleanings.
-Full power service ammunition: CCI Blazer and Blazer Brass only for ammo, 10,000 rounds worth. This stuff is no mouse fart loading, for sure, especially the alloy Blazer.
-Weaponlight use: Between 75% and 80% of my shooting has been done with a TLR-1 mounted. This stiffens the frame and accelerates wear on the recoil spring.
What did all this tell me? Well, mostly what I already knew. Glocks chambered in .40 S&W require more care and maintenance over their 9mm brethren.
In my past experience shooting 9mm Glocks, I've had to replace VERY few parts on my guns. (Routine spring changes are NOT included in this statement).
The pistol was given a detail stripping before the start of the test, at the six month mark, and again last night after the test's conclusion. I noted at the beginning that several of the slide parts had appeared to have been "fluffed", but I left them in place.
This particular G22 has required several parts changes:
--Recoil spring, replaced at the 5000 round point, per suggestion from Glock.
--Trigger pin, replaced at the six month mark.
--Slide Stop Lever w/spring, replaced two months ago when the broken part was discovered.
--Trigger w/trigger bar assembly, replaced at end of test.
--Connector, replaced at end of test.
--Firing Pin Safety, replaced at the six month mark.
--Firing Pin Safety Spring, replaced at the six month mark.
Each part was replaced because of either breakage in the case of the trigger pin and slide stop lever, or what appeared to be unhealthy wear in the case of the other parts. The trigger pin's breakage did not affect the gun's reliability. The Slide stop lever spring did by flopping around causing the slide to lock back prematurely. The trigger parts were replaced due to galling (increasing the trigger pull to nearly ten pounds).
Reliability throughout the test was nearly perfect. Nearly. The slide stop lever breakage gave a few problems until I figured out what the issue was. The case of Blazer alloy combined with the weaponlight was also problematic (though brass cased ammunition was always flawless).
I'll now open up the floor to CIVILIZED discussion. As in the past, if you want to participate like a grown up, you're welcome to post. If you want to trash and bash, I'll happily abuse my Staff powers to remove your posts. Threads of this nature are supposed to be educational...keep it that way.bc
Good shot! OK, he's dead; let's go get 'im. That's another one for the fire.
Certified GLOCK Armorer
Certified Sig Sauer Armorer
IDPA SOI, SSP/MA